Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · California

Laser Electric, Inc.

Escondido, CA · ~120 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laser Electric, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Laser Electric, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 49% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laser Electric, Inc. safety composite

Laser Electric, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

Laser Electric, Inc. injury rate improved

Laser Electric, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Escondido, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #114/548
  • PHOTO Meany Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meany Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Laser Electric, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laser Electric, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (49% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laser Electric, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Laser Electric, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 548 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in California.

Laser Electric, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Laser Electric, Inc.
Laser Electric, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Laser Electric, Inc. has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.3 3 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2019 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Escondido

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Escondido, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meany Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR George R. Smalley Co., Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BlueCore Power LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lumin8 Transportation Technologies, LLC. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spreckels 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Healdsburg 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ito Brothers Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Citrus 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Escondido 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Escondido 3,031 FTE
CITY-NEAR Escondido CA 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR MKS Bozeman 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Lake Fire Protection District 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution Services 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR M. Sullivan Construction 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Visiting Angels of Lancaster County 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE GMP Operations HQ - Rutland 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Placing Hawaii 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill Plant 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.