Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing · California

Lathrop Division

Lathrop, CA · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lathrop Division runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lathrop Division: 7.7 TCR = 234% of Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lathrop Division safety composite

Lathrop Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2019→2024

Lathrop Division injury rate improved

Lathrop Division's TCR fell 4.2 from 10.1 in 2019 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.1 · 2020=13.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Lathrop, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 234% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #46/53
  • PHOTO Standard Concrete Pr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Standard Concrete Products - Tampa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lathrop Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lathrop Division averages 7.7 TCR (234% of the Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lathrop Division TCR series: 2019=10.1 · 2020=13.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Lathrop Division falls in its industry

790 Prestressed concrete products establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 53 Prestressed concrete products employers in California.

Lathrop Division (88 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lathrop Division
Lathrop Division (88 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Lathrop Division has more employees than the Prestressed concrete products (except bl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 5.9 5 0 0
2023 8.6 6.1 7 0 0
2022 5.9 4.7 5 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 13.3 13.3 11 0 0
2019 10.1 10.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · CA · Lathrop

790 Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lathrop, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Standard Concrete Products - Tampa 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AERCON Florida LLC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Concrete Products 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precast Supply Company 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Hill Ranches Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR CALAH - LATHROP HUB 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR LATHROP HUB (CALAH) 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Lathrop-Harlan Rd-Manufacturing 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2802_5346 516 FTE
NAT-TCR 1458 - Houston North Central 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clegg's Termite & Pest Control - Raleigh 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JES Foods Celina 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #263 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Hill Dc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE 85 Davids 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recovering Hope Treatment Center Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lindenmeyr Dallas 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.