Skilled nursing facilities · Massachusetts

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center

Jamaica Plain, MA · ~160 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center: 3.9 TCR = 59% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center safety composite

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−54.7

2020→2021

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center injury rate improved

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center's TCR fell 54.7 from 58.5 in 2020 to 3.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 58.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=58.5 · 2021=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Jamaica Plain, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #80/423
  • PHOTO Parkshore Estates Nu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parkshore Estates Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center averages 3.9 TCR (59% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center TCR series: 2020=58.5 · 2021=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 423 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Massachusetts.

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center (160 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center
Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center (160 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Laurel Ridge Rehab And Skilled Care Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.9 2.9 1 3 0
2020 58.5 58.5 0 50 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MA · Jamaica Plain

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 12 employers in Jamaica Plain, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parkshore Estates Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohman Family Living at Briar 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Creek Health and Rehab 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huntsville Health Care Center 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alphagary 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brainin Advance Industries 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC1 MED - MEDWAY 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGSP-W952 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital 1,651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR COMM OF MA MDPH BIDLS 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10438 Jamaica Plain 140 FTE
NAT-TCR VRH 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PA Field 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Banner Del E Webb Medical Center EM 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Plastics Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE UNC - Rochester Plant & Distribution 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtis 1000 Inc. - 0223-GADU1 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE PERI Elkridge 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE US082: Tampa 292 - SG 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.