Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Illinois

Laurette Southview Operations

Chicago, IL · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laurette Southview Operations runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Laurette Southview Operations: 17.9 TCR = 276% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laurette Southview Operations safety composite

Laurette Southview Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.6

2021→2022

Laurette Southview Operations injury rate improved

Laurette Southview Operations's TCR fell 24.6 from 30.2 in 2021 to 5.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 30.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=30.2 · 2022=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 276% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #781/857
  • PHOTO Wadley SNF, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wadley SNF, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Laurette Southview Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laurette Southview Operations averages 17.9 TCR (276% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laurette Southview Operations TCR series: 2021=30.2 · 2022=5.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Laurette Southview Operations falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #781 safest of 857 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Illinois.

Laurette Southview Operations (120 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Laurette Southview Operations
Laurette Southview Operations (120 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Laurette Southview Operations has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.6 5.6 2 4 0
2021 30.2 30.2 2 34 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IL · Chicago

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wadley SNF, LLC 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden House 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Healthcare Elkin, Inc DBA Hugh Chatham Nursing Center 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christian Care Assisted Living 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ragnar Benson 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE TKC Highland 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Constructors 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE 123 - Archer Western/Herzog 4 JV 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Canyon Valley Memory Care 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Duo-Safety Ladder Corporation 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-LASPW9622 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Department of State Hospitals - Coalinga 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #669 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Plate Interior Plant 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #602 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wear Technology 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.