Administrative management consulting services · California

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Livermore, CA · ~498 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Administrative management consulting services workplace, earning a grade F.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: 1.2 TCR = 246% of Administrative management consulting services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory safety composite

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2020

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory injury rate improved

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.2 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541611 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.2 · 246% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Blue E Management, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~498 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue E Management, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory averages 1.2 TCR (246% of the Administrative management consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=2 · 2020=0.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory falls in its industry

128 Administrative management cons establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Administrative management cons employers in California.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (498 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (498 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has more employees than the Administrative management consulting ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 2.0 0.7 6 0 0
2018 1.2 0.3 4 0 0
2017 1.2 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541611 · CA · Livermore

128 Administrative management consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue E Management, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4701-574 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clampett Industries LLC d/b/a EMG - Corporate Office 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley East 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SPI - WS Red Bluff 498 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAAKT Campus, Applied Materials, (Bldg. 91,92, 93, 21) 498 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walters Wholesale Electric 498 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA MONICA SEAFOOD 498 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Athens Hiwassee 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Winds 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lauyans & Co on Chestnut 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR M&L Metairie 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Stonington 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuscaloosa Plant 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cti Foods 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE BISSELL Homecare, Inc. 498 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.