Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap · Massachusetts

LeachGarner 49 Pearl

Attleboro, MA · ~442 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LeachGarner 49 Pearl runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap workplace, earning a grade D.

LeachGarner 49 Pearl: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LeachGarner 49 Pearl safety composite

LeachGarner 49 Pearl scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2021

LeachGarner 49 Pearl injury rate improved

LeachGarner 49 Pearl's TCR fell 1.1 from 5.2 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.2 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331491 · Attleboro, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Metallic Resources 2…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~442 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metallic Resources 2368 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

LeachGarner 49 Pearl in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LeachGarner 49 Pearl averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LeachGarner 49 Pearl TCR series: 2019=5.2 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where LeachGarner 49 Pearl falls in its industry

113 Precious metal bar, rod, sheet establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Precious metal bar, rod, sheet employers in Massachusetts.

LeachGarner 49 Pearl (442 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LeachGarner 49 Pearl
LeachGarner 49 Pearl (442 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.1

LeachGarner 49 Pearl has more employees than the Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.1 3.7 21 0 0
2020 4.8 3.4 17 0 0
2019 5.2 3.7 17 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331491 · MA · Attleboro

113 Precious metal bar, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 71 employers in Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metallic Resources 2368 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radcliff Wire Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memry West 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arcadia Tubular Facility 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Performance Springfield - 0735 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kovalus Separation Solution, LLC 441 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amgen Inc. (Cambridge, MA) 443 FTE
STATE-SIZE 59212 HILTON BOSTON PARK PLAZA 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Health Hospital 2,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Memorial Hospital 1,750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sensata Technologies, Inc. Attleboro, MA 839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 505 Collins St. 689 FTE
NAT-TCR E&H Conveyors Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Office of Aging and Disabled Services 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Herr Foods Inc. 60 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CAN 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zion Benton Township High School District #126 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunset Scavenger Company 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE ClubCorp 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danone Minster OH 442 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.