Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Leaman Container Inc

Fort Worth, TX · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leaman Container Inc runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Leaman Container Inc: 4.3 TCR = 131% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leaman Container Inc safety composite

Leaman Container Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Leaman Container Inc: 2.2 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.91× in 2024

Leaman Container Inc's TCR rose 6.0 from 2.2 in 2017 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 131% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #87/102
  • PHOTO NJ075 Milford (Corru…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NJ075 Milford (Corrugated Paper Group) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Leaman Container Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leaman Container Inc averages 4.3 TCR (131% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leaman Container Inc TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=7.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Leaman Container Inc falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

Leaman Container Inc (54 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Leaman Container Inc
Leaman Container Inc (54 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Leaman Container Inc has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 3 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.3 7.3 4 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · Fort Worth

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NJ075 Milford (Corrugated Paper Group) 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rand-Whitney Container LLC, Agrand & Greenwood 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyler Corrugated Box Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Packaging Corp 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Randall County Feedyard 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1681 CORPORATE DR MCKINNEY TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3525 N HWY 77 WAXAHACHIE TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Resources LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlantic Sapphire 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR San Diego Ca - 360 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2852 Sxb9 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 086 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE B&C Steel Corporation 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque Nm - 339 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Littell Steel Company, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Braselton 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.