Automotive Supplier · Michigan

Lear Corporation - Roscommon

Roscommon, MI · ~369 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Corporation - Roscommon runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automotive Supplier workplace, earning a grade D.

Lear Corporation - Roscommon: 10.0 TCR = 185% of Automotive Supplier BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Corporation - Roscommon safety composite

Lear Corporation - Roscommon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.8

2016→2024

Lear Corporation - Roscommon injury rate improved

Lear Corporation - Roscommon's TCR fell 9.8 from 15.5 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.5 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Roscommon, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.0 · 185% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #149/165
  • PHOTO Ultraform Industries
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 316 inj
  • SIZE ~369 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ultraform Industries (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lear Corporation - Roscommon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Corporation - Roscommon averages 10.0 TCR (185% of the Automotive Supplier BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Corporation - Roscommon TCR series: 2016=15.5 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Lear Corporation - Roscommon falls in its industry

510 Automotive Supplier establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 165 Automotive Supplier employers in Michigan.

Lear Corporation - Roscommon (369 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Corporation - Roscommon
Lear Corporation - Roscommon (369 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lear Corporation - Roscommon has more employees than the Automotive Supplier median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.8 9 3 0
2023 6.1 3.5 14 0 0
2022 4.4 3.0 15 0 0
2021 12.3 8.6 46 11 0
2020 11.4 10.2 49 0 0
2019 9.8 6.8 47 5 0
2018 14.8 12.9 67 18 0
2016 15.5 14.0 69 14 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Roscommon

510 Automotive Supplier employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Roscommon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ultraform Industries 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stampline 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prince Metal Stampings USA, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Wings Industries, Inc. 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Steel 369 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZF-Fowlerville 369 FTE
STATE-SIZE NBHX Trim USA 369 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain : Norton Shores, MI 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lighthouse at Roscommon 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Point of Roscommon 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1516 Family Fare -Roscommon, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR R+L Carriers - GRY 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Genacross - Family and Youth Services 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis-Clark Terminal, Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R. F. Jordan & Sons Construction main office 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Garreco Heber Springs 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Baldwyn AIE 369 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryan Herco Flow Solutions 369 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency 369 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth Winter Garden 369 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.