Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Oklahoma

Legend at Mingo Road

Tulsa, OK · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legend at Mingo Road runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Legend at Mingo Road: 12.6 TCR = 332% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legend at Mingo Road safety composite

Legend at Mingo Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Legend at Mingo Road held a steady TCR band

Legend at Mingo Road's TCR held near 0.1 from 10.9 in 2016 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 25.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2018=25.1 · 2019=22.7 · 2020=18.3 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 332% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #43/47
  • PHOTO NORTH SHORE PLACE
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORTH SHORE PLACE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Legend at Mingo Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legend at Mingo Road averages 12.6 TCR (332% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legend at Mingo Road TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2018=25.1 · 2019=22.7 · 2020=18.3 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=11 · BLS 3.8

Where Legend at Mingo Road falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 47 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oklahoma.

Legend at Mingo Road (63 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legend at Mingo Road
Legend at Mingo Road (63 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Legend at Mingo Road has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 8.8 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 10.3 10.3 2 2 0
2020 18.3 16.0 8 0 0
2019 22.7 22.7 10 0 0
2018 25.1 25.1 12 0 0
2016 10.9 8.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OK · Tulsa

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORTH SHORE PLACE 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inn At Garden Plaza 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amethyst Gardens 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mainstreet Village 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chaparral Energy, LLC - OKC Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeastern 3 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cookson Hills Electric Cooperative Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Plant 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Country Meadows of Allentown 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Meadows of Leader Heights 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenfield Care Center of Fillmore 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Storm Lake Plant 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montevallo 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manchester Airport 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fashion Place #557 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cambria FabShop Cleveland LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.