Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Oklahoma

Legend at Rivendell

Oklahoma City, OK · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legend at Rivendell runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Legend at Rivendell: 4.2 TCR = 110% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legend at Rivendell safety composite

Legend at Rivendell scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Legend at Rivendell held a steady TCR band

Legend at Rivendell's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.5 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Oklahoma City, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 110% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #11/47
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Semi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of Seminole (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Legend at Rivendell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legend at Rivendell averages 4.2 TCR (110% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legend at Rivendell TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=5 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Legend at Rivendell falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 47 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oklahoma.

Legend at Rivendell (59 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legend at Rivendell
Legend at Rivendell (59 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Legend at Rivendell has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2023 9.9 9.9 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 0 1 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2016 4.5 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OK · Oklahoma City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Seminole 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ST JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0414-Harmony Trace 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dominion Senior Living of Athens 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shawnee Service Center 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore Service Center 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEWELL BROS., INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter Heat and Air 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Koppers Florence 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CLARO / PRT - Cayey CO 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodfield Mall 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Haynes Electric Utility 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Carolina TPL 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE JP 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayport PVOH 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelson Electric Co. LC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.