Food concession contractors (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) · California

Legends - Sacramento Kings

Name: Legends - Sacramento Kings Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Sacramento, CA · ~476 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 6.9
Avg TCR: 3.0
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legends - Sacramento Kings runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food concession contractors (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) workplace, earning a grade F.

Legends - Sacramento Kings: 6.9 TCR = 229% of Food concession contractors (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legends - Sacramento Kings safety composite

Legends - Sacramento Kings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2018

Legends - Sacramento Kings injury rate improved

Legends - Sacramento Kings's TCR fell 2.0 from 7.7 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 229% of ind

DART 5.1 DART
RANK #412/586
PHOTO SODEXO AT LUTHER COL…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 29 inj
SIZE ~476 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT LUTHER COLLEGE RESIDENT DINING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.9
SODEXO AT LUTH

6.9
200441900 LUCA

6.9
Fresh Picks Ca

6.9
GOOGLE GPAK CA

6.9

What this shows Legends - Sacramento Kings averages 6.9 TCR (229% of the Food concession contractors (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS benchmark).

Legends - Sacramento Kings TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=5.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Legends - Sacramento Kings falls in its industry

6,952 Food concession contractors (e establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #412 safest of 586 Food concession contractors (e employers in California.

Legends - Sacramento Kings (476 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Legends - Sacramento Kings has more employees than the Food concession contractors (e.g., conve median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2018	5.6	5.1	10
2017	7.4	6.2	13
2016	7.7	7.7	6

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Sacramento

6,952 Food concession contractors (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	SODEXO AT LUTHER COLLEGE RESIDENT DINING	DECORAH, IA	6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	200441900 LUCAS COUNTY JAIL	TOLEDO, OH	6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fresh Picks Cafe - North Middlesex Regional	TOWNSEND, MA	6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	GOOGLE GPAK CATERING	MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA	6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Flex	POWAY	476 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - COMMERCE 30711	COMMERCE	476 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Jurupa Valley, CA (Walmart) 432	JURUPA VALLEY	476 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Fresno Heart and Surgical Hospital	FRESNO	476 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC Davis Health	Sacramento	10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Employment Development Department	Sacramento	8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 451	Sacramento	5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 485	Sacramento	5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR	Viacord-Hebron	Hebron, KY	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bay Breeze Health and Rehab	Venice, FL	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Uge Day	Vandalia, OH	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Darling Ravenna 270	Ravenna, NE	6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	CNH_New_Holland_Manufacturing_Center	New_holland, PA	476 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bocchi Laboratories OH	New Albany, OH	476 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Accredo Health Group, Inc. Indianapolis IN	Indianapolis, IN	476 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mayo Clinic Health System-Fairmont	Fairmont, MN	476 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.