Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co.

Chapel Hill, NC · ~110 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co.: 7.8 TCR = 119% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. safety composite

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2018→2020

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. injury rate improved

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 9.4 in 2018 to 5.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.4 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Chapel Hill, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.8 · 119% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #315/510
  • PHOTO CAREONE AT THE HIGHL…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CAREONE AT THE HIGHLANDS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. averages 7.8 TCR (119% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. TCR series: 2018=9.4 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=5.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #315 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. (110 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co.
Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. (110 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Legion Road Healthcare of Orange Co. has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.5 5.5 4 0 0
2019 8.4 8.4 6 0 0
2018 9.4 9.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Chapel Hill

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Chapel Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CAREONE AT THE HIGHLANDS 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ingleside Communities 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Health Care and Rehab Center - Sarasota 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Onaga Health and Rehabilitation 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MSF Electric, Inc. North Carolina 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Charlotte 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE 698 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE B-Organized Insulation & Specialty Products #764 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 21,973 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Health Care 11,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spec Personnel, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale chapel hill 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Qualtek Manufacturing Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PVII Viera Manor Company, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Village at The Palms 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MLA 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Queen Victoria Farms, LP 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE LuLu's Destin, LLC. 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shapco Printing 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.