Housing construction, for-sale builder · Texas

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC

Irving, TX · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing construction, for-sale builder workplace, earning a grade A.

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC: 1.2 TCR = 32% of Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC safety composite

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC held a steady TCR band

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Irving, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/63
  • PHOTO Taylor Morrison Dall…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taylor Morrison Dallas Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC averages 1.2 TCR (32% of the Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC falls in its industry

341 Housing construction, for-sale establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 63 Housing construction, for-sale employers in Texas.

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC (41 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC
Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC (41 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar Central ROC DFW-ROC has fewer employees than the Housing construction, for-sale builder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.6 3.2 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · TX · Irving

341 Housing construction, for-sale builder employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 548 employers in Irving, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taylor Morrison Dallas Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar Corporate Miami 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ODESSA TX WEST 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Quadrant Corporation 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Val Verde Vegetable Co., Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE LS QUIEN SABE LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE BREEDER / BROILER DEPARTMENT 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Expo12 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50CP001 CORP LAS COLINAS 4,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXC101551 2,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Corporation 2727 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RBD5 1,964 FTE
NAT-TCR John Moriarty & Associates, Inc. (VA/DC) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateways Main Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR American Paper Mill Supplies LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Planer Mill 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE L'Arche Syracuse 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAZ-Casa Grande Office/Operations 0032-FAC11 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamlett Associates, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amsty Hanging Rock 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.