Housing construction, for-sale builder · California

Lennar Inland

Corona, CA · ~333 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar Inland runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing construction, for-sale builder workplace, earning a grade A.

Lennar Inland: 1.4 TCR = 37% of Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar Inland safety composite

Lennar Inland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lennar Inland: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2024

Lennar Inland's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Corona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #18/43
  • PHOTO Lennar Central Valley
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~333 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lennar Central Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lennar Inland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar Inland averages 1.4 TCR (37% of the Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar Inland TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar Inland falls in its industry

341 Housing construction, for-sale establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 43 Housing construction, for-sale employers in California.

Lennar Inland (333 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar Inland
Lennar Inland (333 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar Inland has more employees than the Housing construction, for-sale builder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2023 1.8 1.4 5 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2021 2.2 1.4 6 0 0
2020 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2019 3.1 0.8 8 0 0
2018 2.4 0.8 6 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · CA · Corona

341 Housing construction, for-sale builder employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lennar Central Valley 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 800-DREES-INDIANAPOLIS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar Las Vegas 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chavez Farm Labor Contractor, Inc. 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE KDC Inc. Los Alamitos 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE 67680038-1190 LOUIS VUITTON US MFG-LOUIS VUITTON US MFG 1 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAWRENCE EQUIPMENT EL MONTE 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Premium Waters, Inc. Las Vegas 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawnee Plus 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Athens Trailer Operations 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Covestro Deerfield 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE C004 Knoxville 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE S3 Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) Operations 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peoria Hospitals Mobile Medical Services ABA Advanced Medical Transport of Central Illinois 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise Alaska Reservations 333 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.