Housing construction, for-sale builder · California

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento

Roseville, CA · ~291 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing construction, for-sale builder workplace, earning a grade A.

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento: 1.5 TCR = 39% of Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento safety composite

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2024

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento injury rate improved

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.0 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 39% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #22/43
  • PHOTO 300-DREES-WASHINGTON…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~291 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 300-DREES-WASHINGTON DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento averages 1.5 TCR (39% of the Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento falls in its industry

341 Housing construction, for-sale establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 43 Housing construction, for-sale employers in California.

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento (291 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento
Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento (291 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar - Roseville/Sacramento has more employees than the Housing construction, for-sale builder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 6 0 0
2023 2.2 1.5 6 0 0
2022 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2020 1.9 0.5 4 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 3.0 1.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · CA · Roseville

341 Housing construction, for-sale builder employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 300-DREES-WASHINGTON DC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Orange County-Los Angeles 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Homes Dallas, LLC. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KB Home - South Bay Division Office 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Madison Farms LLC 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pistachio Plant 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morada Produce Co LP 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCH Shafter Office 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR ZVI Construction, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpharetta 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ISLE 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Syracuse, NY - 241 Farrell Rd 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carlisle 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Contractors Corp 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valencia Hills Healthcare and Rehab Center 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adient, Pulaski Plant 291 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.