Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing · Georgia

Lenox Square

Atlanta, GA · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lenox Square runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lenox Square: 4.5 TCR = 319% of Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lenox Square safety composite

Lenox Square scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lenox Square: 1.1 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Lenox Square's TCR rose 4.3 from 1.1 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 319% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Tacoma Mall
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tacoma Mall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Lenox Square in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lenox Square averages 4.5 TCR (319% of the Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lenox Square TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 1.4

Where Lenox Square falls in its industry

302 Shopping center (i.e., not ope establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Shopping center (i.e., not ope employers in Georgia.

Lenox Square (66 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lenox Square
Lenox Square (66 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Lenox Square has more employees than the Shopping center (i.e., not operating con median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 5.5 0 1 0
2023 10.7 10.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 13.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · GA · Atlanta

302 Shopping center (i.e., not operating contained businesses) rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tacoma Mall 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Mall of Monroe 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2905-29050002-4077 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jefferson District - Jackson EMC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Rivers Energy 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jefferson District Jackson EMC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakley Ind Operating 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd Union City 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR API Spring 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Builders Systems Incorporated 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elderwood Village at Vestal 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmington NM FXFE-FMT 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE All American Pest Control, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Kentucky State Cafe Res Dining 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE 387 - Frederick 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE 491 - Amarillo 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.