General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Oregon

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario

Ontario, OR · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario runs at 524% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario: 23.6 TCR = 524% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario safety composite

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2023

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario injury rate improved

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario's TCR fell 3.1 from 24.1 in 2017 to 21.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 46.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.1 · 2018=20.2 · 2019=46.3 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=14.0 · 2023=21.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Ontario, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.6 · 524% of ind

  • DART 21.0 DART
  • RANK #47/47
  • PHOTO FL-Saint Petersburg-…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FL-Saint Petersburg-Lowes (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Les Schwab Transport-Ontario averages 23.6 TCR (524% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario TCR series: 2017=24.1 · 2018=20.2 · 2019=46.3 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=14 · 2023=21 · BLS 4.5

Where Les Schwab Transport-Ontario falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 47 General freight trucking, long employers in Oregon.

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario (26 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Les Schwab Transport-Ontario
Les Schwab Transport-Ontario (26 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Les Schwab Transport-Ontario has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.0 21.0 6 0 0
2022 14.0 10.5 4 0 0
2021 11.2 11.2 3 0 0
2020 28.3 20.2 7 0 0
2019 46.3 42.1 11 0 0
2018 20.2 16.2 5 0 0
2017 24.1 8.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · OR · Ontario

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 39 employers in Ontario, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FL-Saint Petersburg-Lowes 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transport 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Redlands 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VA-South Boston-Dollar Gen Ind 22.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenhouses 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lochmead Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Forestry, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millersburg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Company 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Ontario 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1951 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario-SAHS-ID/OR 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Milaca Elim Meadows Healthcare Center 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AMZL-NA : Summit City Spartan Delivery LLC 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Ofc/Whse 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chester Mental Health Center 23.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martera - Pittsburgh 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morris, Il - 231 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mount, Nc - 294 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresno, Ca - 372 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.