Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local · Arkansas

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc.

Harrison, AR · ~96 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local workplace, earning a grade B.

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 75% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. safety composite

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2022

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. injury rate improved

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 5.1 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Harrison, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO Petro-Chemical Trans…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (75% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. TCR series: 2018=5.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. falls in its industry

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Trucking, specialized freight employers in Arkansas.

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc.
Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Lew Thompson & Son Dedicated, Inc. has more employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 1.9 4 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2019 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · AR · Harrison

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 58 employers in Harrison, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Petro-Chemical Transport 51096 Arlington 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paul Bradigan & Sons, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadiz Crude Fleet 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.R. Ewell, Inc. Decatur Terminal 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Craighead Electric Cooperative Corporation Jonesboro 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klein Tools Fort Smith 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shippers Products 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hackney Ladish INC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Arkansas Regional Medical Center 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Freight GO AR FXFE-GO 674 FTE
CITY-NEAR FYVPC 600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Area Agency on Aging of NW AR 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Lofton Label, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City Store #839 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 478 - Hillsborough 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 956 - East Peoria 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MIA-ODFL 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Location 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentwood Nursing Facility 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31 - Clarksburg 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.