Nursing homes · Missouri

Lewis County Nursing Home District

Canton, MO · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lewis County Nursing Home District runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Lewis County Nursing Home District: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lewis County Nursing Home District safety composite

Lewis County Nursing Home District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Lewis County Nursing Home District injury rate improved

Lewis County Nursing Home District's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=14.6 · 2019=9.0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Canton, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #315/457
  • PHOTO Stone Oak Care Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stone Oak Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Lewis County Nursing Home District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lewis County Nursing Home District averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lewis County Nursing Home District TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=14.6 · 2019=9 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Lewis County Nursing Home District falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #315 safest of 457 Nursing homes employers in Missouri.

Lewis County Nursing Home District (79 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lewis County Nursing Home District
Lewis County Nursing Home District (79 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Lewis County Nursing Home District has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2022 12.5 3.6 7 0 0
2021 14.7 11.4 9 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2019 9.0 7.5 5 1 0
2018 14.6 7.9 10 1 0
2017 12.3 8.2 9 0 0
2016 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MO · Canton

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 12 employers in Canton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stone Oak Care Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Meadows of Kalida 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Woods Health Campus 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PruittHealth of Moncks Corner 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2080-Matthews, MO 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete : St Louis 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Joe Soy 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartech LLC - Cape Girardeau 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canton 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR SteakNShake 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canton Marine Towing 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market #409 57 FTE
NAT-TCR RENUoil of America Inc. (MGM) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pre-Stain 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Valley Mn - 3282 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSL-Laketown Village 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern California Grading, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Works (Operations) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7891-Pdllc-Bard College 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianola Harvest Innovations 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.