Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · South Carolina

Lexington Container

Lexington, SC · ~159 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lexington Container runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Lexington Container: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lexington Container safety composite

Lexington Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2023

Lexington Container injury rate improved

Lexington Container's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.1 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Lexington, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #8/23
  • PHOTO Vermont Container Corp
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vermont Container Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lexington Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lexington Container averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lexington Container TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Lexington Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 23 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in South Carolina.

Lexington Container (159 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Lexington Container
Lexington Container (159 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Lexington Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 3 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2020 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 4 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · SC · Lexington

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 136 employers in Lexington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vermont Container Corp 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Austin 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Rapids Container 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Arden Hills 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4531 Summerville Lumber Mill 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pigment Services Inc. 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE AVANTech, LLC 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roy Metal Finishing Piedmont 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Lexington 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America US7 838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Graphic Products 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Junge Control, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Containers Modesto Doherty 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Petra Chemical Company 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brek Manufacturing 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muth Mirror Systems LLC 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Aluminum 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital St. Louis 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.