Building cleaning services, janitorial · South Carolina

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228

West Columbia, SC · ~116 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade D.

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228: 6.4 TCR = 143% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 safety composite

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2021

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 injury rate improved

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.2 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=23.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · West Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 143% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #63/72
  • PHOTO Yuma Office
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yuma Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 averages 6.4 TCR (143% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=23.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 72 Building cleaning services, ja employers in South Carolina.

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 (116 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228
Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 (116 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Lexington School Dist 2 - 12228 has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 23.4 23.4 1 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.2 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · SC · West Columbia

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 171 employers in West Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yuma Office 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Tech at Lakes County Health Dept 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshfield Med Ctr-Marshfield 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Lourdes Hospital - EVS 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Georgetown Container 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE FQP&P, LLC 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain - Camden, SC 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1646 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lexington Medical Center 4,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-02 4,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CAE1 2,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CAE1 2,722 FTE
NAT-TCR Bio Star Films, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR WIM 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR STA-Lakeside (DYL-340) 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Roth'S - Silverton 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LA Hydrojet and Rooter Service, Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE US028: AFC - Monogram 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE VenuWorks of Bemidji 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Derby Industries, LLC Allentown 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.