Retirement communities, continuing care · Illinois

Lexington Square of Elmhurst

Elmhurst, IL · ~63 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lexington Square of Elmhurst runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Lexington Square of Elmhurst: 6.3 TCR = 167% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lexington Square of Elmhurst safety composite

Lexington Square of Elmhurst scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lexington Square of Elmhurst held a steady TCR band

Lexington Square of Elmhurst's TCR held near 0.3 from 9.2 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.4 · 2022=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Elmhurst, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 167% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #105/265
  • PHOTO SD,Dell Rapids-Orcha…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SD,Dell Rapids-Orchard Hills-Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Lexington Square of Elmhurst in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lexington Square of Elmhurst averages 6.3 TCR (167% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lexington Square of Elmhurst TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.4 · 2022=8.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Lexington Square of Elmhurst falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 265 Retirement communities, contin employers in Illinois.

Lexington Square of Elmhurst (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lexington Square of Elmhurst
Lexington Square of Elmhurst (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lexington Square of Elmhurst has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.9 3.0 2 1 0
2019 5.4 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.2 4.1 5 1 0
2016 9.2 8.1 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Elmhurst

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 127 employers in Elmhurst, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SD,Dell Rapids-Orchard Hills-Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Oaks of Orangeburg, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holzer Assisted Living - Jackson 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avenir Memory Care at Fayetteville 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-STC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hinsdale Nurseries, Inc. Plano 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE 40L - IL Relay & Ops 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water/Public Works, Public Utiities 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elmhurst Memorial Hospital 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Superior Air-Ground Ambulance Services Inc. 2,331 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elmhurst , IL - 01 1,612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elmhurst Community Unit School 205 1,252 FTE
NAT-TCR Walashek Industrial and Marine, National City 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR A. O. Smith Corporation, Apcom Protective Coatings Division 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Glendale Ready Mix 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TJ Beall Company 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE IF CoPack LLC dba Initiative Foods 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merced Suites 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE ONSITE - Georgia 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concho Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.