Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation · Virginia

L.G. Flint, Inc.

Lynchburg, VA · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L.G. Flint, Inc. runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation workplace, earning a grade F.

L.G. Flint, Inc.: 10.5 TCR = 277% of Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L.G. Flint, Inc. safety composite

L.G. Flint, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

L.G. Flint, Inc.: 0.0 → 19.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2024

L.G. Flint, Inc.'s TCR rose 19.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 19.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Lynchburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 277% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #20/21
  • PHOTO Dart Facilities
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dart Facilities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

L.G. Flint, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L.G. Flint, Inc. averages 10.5 TCR (277% of the Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L.G. Flint, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=20 · 2023=21.3 · 2024=19.2 · BLS 3.8

Where L.G. Flint, Inc. falls in its industry

698 Building, residential, additio establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 21 Building, residential, additio employers in Virginia.

L.G. Flint, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate L.G. Flint, Inc.
L.G. Flint, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

L.G. Flint, Inc. has fewer employees than the Building, residential, addition, alterat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.2 3.8 5 0 0
2023 21.3 0.0 5 0 0
2022 20.0 5.0 4 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2020 15.2 5.1 3 0 0
2019 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · VA · Lynchburg

698 Building, residential, addition, alteration and renovation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 360 employers in Lynchburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dart Facilities 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KOHLER SERVICE ORGANIZATION 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owen Gabbert LLC 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott F. McClurg, Inc 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seamans Orchard LC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Short Mountain Orchard Contractors, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ayrshire Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE George's Broadway Hatchery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lynchburg General Hospital 2,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWXT NOG Lynchburg 2,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. - Lynchburg 2,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centra Urgent Care Forest 1,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Tieszen Memorial Home, Inc 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Market Haul -Est 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mesa Fully Formed, LLC - Gilbert 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Compleat Stair Kennesaw GA 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Princeton Save-A-Lot 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga ASU 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill CFL - Curry Ford 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weatherization Program 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.