Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Maryland

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD

Gaithersburg, MD · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD safety composite

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD: 1.8 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2024

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.8 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Gaithersburg, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Roche Molecular Solu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roche Molecular Solutions (Main) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in Maryland.

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD (72 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD
LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD (72 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

LGC Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. MD has fewer employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · MD · Gaithersburg

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 202 employers in Gaithersburg, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roche Molecular Solutions (Main) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sekisui Diagnostics 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phenomenex 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bio-Rad Laboratories - Redmond 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 16604 Norbeck Farm Drive, Olney, MD, 20832 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nations Roof MidAtlantic LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Baltimore 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Elkridge 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Gaithersburg Campus 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDGAI - GAITHERSBURG HUB 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Healthcare Support Center to SGMC 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDGAI - GAITHERSBURG-PACKAGE CENTER 759 FTE
NAT-TCR Aleut Federal, LLC (ALL PERSONNEL - ALL SUBSIDIARIES) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Bridgeport AL 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Heat Transfer Products Group, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR KW Property Management & Consulting LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Rivet & Fastener Co. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Star Service, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAC Machinery Bags & Materials 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Iga 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.