Glass products (except packaging containers) made in a glass making plants · Louisiana

Libbey Shreveport Plant

Shreveport, LA · ~508 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Libbey Shreveport Plant runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made in a glass making plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Libbey Shreveport Plant: 6.7 TCR = 203% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made in a glass making plants BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Libbey Shreveport Plant safety composite

Libbey Shreveport Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Libbey Shreveport Plant: 7.2 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Libbey Shreveport Plant's TCR rose 1.8 from 7.2 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327212 · Shreveport, LA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P19
  • PHOTO Holophane Newark
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 130 inj
  • SIZE ~508 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holophane Newark (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Libbey Shreveport Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Libbey Shreveport Plant averages 6.7 TCR (203% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made in a glass making plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Libbey Shreveport Plant TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=9 · 2021=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Libbey Shreveport Plant falls in its industry

75 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Libbey Shreveport Plant (508 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Libbey Shreveport Plant
Libbey Shreveport Plant (508 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Libbey Shreveport Plant has more employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 9.0 3.0 19 8 0
2019 6.5 3.9 35 4 0
2018 3.9 2.3 18 2 0
2017 4.6 3.8 25 2 0
2016 7.2 3.5 30 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327212 · LA · Shreveport

75 Glass products (except packaging containers) made in a glass making plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holophane Newark 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Lighting : Logan, OH 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR China Jushi USA 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakland 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Linetec Services LLC - West Distribution 506 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Bogalusa Mill 506 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sabine Pass LNG-L.P., LLC 510 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEMOINE 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilson Landscape Associates 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Futurex Industries - Woody 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Walnut Creek Alzheimer's Special Care Center 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Malaga Building D 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aacres Wa LLC - Tacoma 508 FTE
NAT-SIZE Star Tribune Media Holdings, Old Startribune Holding Bldg 508 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marine Hydraulics International LLC 508 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hudick Excavating, Inc. 508 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.