Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Liberty Lutheran Services

Ambler, PA · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Liberty Lutheran Services runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Liberty Lutheran Services: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Liberty Lutheran Services safety composite

Liberty Lutheran Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Liberty Lutheran Services held a steady TCR band

Liberty Lutheran Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=25.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ambler, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #109/257
  • PHOTO LEGACY VILLAGE OF PR…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY VILLAGE OF PROVO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Liberty Lutheran Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Liberty Lutheran Services averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Liberty Lutheran Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=25.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Liberty Lutheran Services falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Liberty Lutheran Services (57 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Liberty Lutheran Services
Liberty Lutheran Services (57 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Liberty Lutheran Services has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 25.2 25.2 0 12 0
2021 14.7 14.7 0 7 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Ambler

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 30 employers in Ambler, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF PROVO 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Andara Senior Living 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independence Village of Olde Raleigh 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Springhouse Estates 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE John R. Stinson & Sons Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Medical LLC. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Pleasant Egg 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mother Earth, LLC 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-044 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-44 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-90170000-9017 376 FTE
NAT-TCR 4014 Troutdale 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6371 Winter Haven 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6650 Cypress 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6974 Jacksonville Beach 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drexel Chemical - 1700 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Industries Investments llc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&H United Fueling Solutions OKC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMX2082 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.