Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth safety composite

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth: 2.3 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.3 in 2023 to 5.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #83/102
  • PHOTO Schwarz Partners
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schwarz Partners (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth TCR series: 2023=2.3 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth (138 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth
Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth (138 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Liberty Packaging Ft. Worth has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 3.8 7 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · Fort Worth

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schwarz Partners 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Butler 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packaging Unlimited, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Converting Division Nashville), LLC 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robinson Drilling of Texas 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odessa Brigade Energy Services 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Pumping 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longview TX 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR North Bellmore 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rudolph Foods Company New Hebron 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kempf Philadelphia 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenn Rieder Residential LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Valley Cheese 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Fraser Inc 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frankfort Traffic Center 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Emergency North 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.