Continuing care retirement communities · Michigan

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village

Kalamazoo, MI · ~337 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village: 12.4 TCR = 326% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village safety composite

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village: 8.3 → 18.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2024

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village's TCR rose 9.8 from 8.3 in 2016 to 18.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Kalamazoo, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 326% of ind

  • DART 16.4 DART
  • RANK #69/97
  • PHOTO Clover Hill Senior L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~337 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clover Hill Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village averages 12.4 TCR (326% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=18.6 · 2021=11.9 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=18.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 97 Continuing care retirement com employers in Michigan.

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village (337 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village
Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village (337 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lifecare Inc., DBA Friendship Village has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.1 16.4 16 26 0
2023 13.8 13.8 10 23 0
2021 11.9 9.8 12 16 0
2020 18.6 17.4 14 32 0
2019 9.2 8.7 21 1 0
2018 6.9 4.7 15 1 0
2016 8.3 7.4 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Kalamazoo

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 353 employers in Kalamazoo, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clover Hill Senior Living 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northbrook Inn 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everlan Hixson, LLC 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Iowa City 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C.A. Hull Co., Inc. 337 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magna Modular Systems LLC dba AIM Systems 337 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1928 337 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5159 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronson Methodist Hospital 4,909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Kalamazoo - Portage Road 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments 2,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL1 2,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Center for the Blind and Disabled 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DOB4 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Framecom, Inc. dba FC Framing 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bokers 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beaver County Rehabilitation Center, Inc. - CenterPlace 337 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Glenridge on Palmer Ranch 337 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orca Bay Foods LLC 337 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2412 - Hawaii-Kona 337 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.