Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

LifeServices - Salida Woods

Mentor, OH · ~45 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LifeServices - Salida Woods runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

LifeServices - Salida Woods: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LifeServices - Salida Woods safety composite

LifeServices - Salida Woods scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LifeServices - Salida Woods: 13.6 → 19.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 19.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.05× in 2022

LifeServices - Salida Woods's TCR rose 5.9 from 13.6 in 2016 to 19.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mentor, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 19.5 DART
  • RANK #198/243
  • PHOTO Linwood Estates
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Linwood Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

LifeServices - Salida Woods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LifeServices - Salida Woods averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LifeServices - Salida Woods TCR series: 2016=13.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=19.5 · BLS 3.8

Where LifeServices - Salida Woods falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #198 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

LifeServices - Salida Woods (45 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate LifeServices - Salida Woods
LifeServices - Salida Woods (45 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

LifeServices - Salida Woods has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 19.5 19.5 5 0 0
2021 9.8 9.8 3 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 13.6 10.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Mentor

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 180 employers in Mentor, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Linwood Estates 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Remington at Valley Ranch 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentmoor Retirement Community 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villa West #557 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Energy Partners, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GSO OFFICE - NORTH CANTON 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 283-NiSource-Wintersville OH-Ohio Valley Op 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 82 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steris HQ 835 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERIS 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avery Dennison - Materials Group Building 22 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lincoln Electric Company - Mentor 514 FTE
NAT-TCR Origlio Beverage 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0777 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-01781 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01600 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Energy Hydraulics Holdings, LLC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 183 N Austin 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Round Barn Brewery & Public House 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #468 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.