Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Arizona

LifeStream Complete Senior Living

Youngtown, AZ · ~370 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LifeStream Complete Senior Living runs at 498% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

LifeStream Complete Senior Living: 18.9 TCR = 498% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LifeStream Complete Senior Living safety composite

LifeStream Complete Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 42.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LifeStream Complete Senior Living: 12.7 → 46.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 46.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.23× in 2020

LifeStream Complete Senior Living's TCR rose 33.7 from 12.7 in 2016 to 46.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Youngtown, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 498% of ind

  • DART 42.3 DART
  • RANK #101/109
  • PHOTO Cogir of Mill Creek
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 178 inj
  • SIZE ~370 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cogir of Mill Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

LifeStream Complete Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LifeStream Complete Senior Living averages 18.9 TCR (498% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LifeStream Complete Senior Living TCR series: 2016=12.7 · 2017=12 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=46.4 · BLS 3.8

Where LifeStream Complete Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

LifeStream Complete Senior Living (370 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate LifeStream Complete Senior Living
LifeStream Complete Senior Living (370 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

LifeStream Complete Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 46.4 42.3 32 103 0
2019 13.1 9.8 39 1 0
2018 10.4 7.5 32 0 0
2017 12.0 8.7 36 0 0
2016 12.7 9.4 39 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Youngtown

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 6 employers in Youngtown, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cogir of Mill Creek 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Amherst 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rose Arbor & Wildflower Lodge 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Palms of Mount Pleasant 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2554 370 FTE
STATE-SIZE Community Partners Inc. 370 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1411 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5190 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR UMAmanecer925 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunview Respiratory and Rehabilitation 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunview Health and Rehabilitation 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR UMHaciendaDelSol925 144 FTE
NAT-TCR Clean and Safe 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brogan Landscaping, Inc.- Northern Region 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Manor of Greenville 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 293 Timnath 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hitachi Healthcare Americas Corporation 370 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pediatric Home Services 370 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate/Baltimore General/ RE Michel/Regional Road/ SSL MD 370 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houohc-015-Houston Home Care 370 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.