Rope, wire, made from purchased wire · Pennsylvania

Lift-All Company Corporate

Landisville, PA · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lift-All Company Corporate runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Rope, wire, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade A.

Lift-All Company Corporate: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Rope, wire, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lift-All Company Corporate safety composite

Lift-All Company Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lift-All Company Corporate held a steady TCR band

Lift-All Company Corporate's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Landisville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/25
  • PHOTO Leviat - Fort Worth
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leviat - Fort Worth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lift-All Company Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lift-All Company Corporate averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Rope, wire, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lift-All Company Corporate TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lift-All Company Corporate falls in its industry

270 Rope, wire, made from purchase establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 25 Rope, wire, made from purchase employers in Pennsylvania.

Lift-All Company Corporate (66 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lift-All Company Corporate
Lift-All Company Corporate (66 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Lift-All Company Corporate has more employees than the Rope, wire, made from purchased wire median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · PA · Landisville

270 Rope, wire, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 16 employers in Landisville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leviat - Fort Worth 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laclede Chain Vicksburg 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Rubbermaid 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bream Orchards Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donegal Egg 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE George E Ley Company 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Mehoopany Site Construction 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utilimaster- Landisville, PA 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 108 IND - LANDISVILLE 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR LANDISVILLE 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wind River Environmental Salunga, PA 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Novaspect Chanhassen 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Corpus Christi 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Monica 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Estee Lauder - MWDC 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Okray Family Farms, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hubbard-Hall, Waterbury 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithers-Oasis Stow St 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #9 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.