Slings, lifting, made from purchased wire · Pennsylvania

Lift-All Company Landisville

Landisville, PA · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lift-All Company Landisville runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Slings, lifting, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade C.

Lift-All Company Landisville: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Slings, lifting, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lift-All Company Landisville safety composite

Lift-All Company Landisville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2021

Lift-All Company Landisville injury rate improved

Lift-All Company Landisville's TCR fell 6.0 from 6.4 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Landisville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #7/25
  • PHOTO Wilkes-Barre Manufac…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wilkes-Barre Manufacturing (WMF) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lift-All Company Landisville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lift-All Company Landisville averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Slings, lifting, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lift-All Company Landisville TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Lift-All Company Landisville falls in its industry

270 Slings, lifting, made from pur establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 25 Slings, lifting, made from pur employers in Pennsylvania.

Lift-All Company Landisville (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lift-All Company Landisville
Lift-All Company Landisville (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Lift-All Company Landisville has fewer employees than the Slings, lifting, made from purchased wir median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 6.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · PA · Landisville

270 Slings, lifting, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 16 employers in Landisville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wilkes-Barre Manufacturing (WMF) 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIREFAB, INC. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR I & I Sling PA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Car-Anth Manufacturing, Inc 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utilimaster- Landisville, PA 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 108 IND - LANDISVILLE 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR LANDISVILLE 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wind River Environmental Salunga, PA 100 FTE
NAT-TCR cemtec 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Redmond Grocery Outlet 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vibracoustic USA, INC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Americold Gainesville, GA 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE War Memorial Hospital Community Medical Center 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE High School 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE LANXESS East Hanover 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pismo Lighthouse Suites 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.