Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Connecticut

Light Metals Coloring

Southington, CT · ~84 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Light Metals Coloring runs at 402% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Light Metals Coloring: 13.3 TCR = 402% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Light Metals Coloring safety composite

Light Metals Coloring scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Light Metals Coloring: 11.0 → 12.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Light Metals Coloring's TCR rose 1.0 from 11.0 in 2016 to 12.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Southington, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 402% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO CMP-P1
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMP-P1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Light Metals Coloring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Light Metals Coloring averages 13.3 TCR (402% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Light Metals Coloring TCR series: 2016=11 · 2017=11.9 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=18.6 · 2022=9.3 · 2024=12.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Light Metals Coloring falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Electroplating metals and form employers in Connecticut.

Light Metals Coloring (84 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Light Metals Coloring
Light Metals Coloring (84 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Light Metals Coloring has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.1 10.6 7 1 0
2022 9.3 6.2 3 3 0
2021 18.6 17.1 12 1 0
2020 13.2 13.2 9 1 0
2019 15.3 15.3 12 1 0
2018 14.7 13.6 12 1 0
2017 11.9 10.3 13 2 0
2016 11.0 5.9 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · CT · Southington

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 57 employers in Southington, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMP-P1 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Remico 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Metal Finishing 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mirror Polishing & Plating Company Inc. 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairfield Processing Corporation 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prostar, Inc 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miyoshi America 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kanthal Corporation 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yarde Metals, Inc.: Connecticut 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yarde Metals Southington CT 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2434 - Southington 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHINGTON CARE CENTER 246 FTE
NAT-TCR Ruff and Ready Moving 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hemet #071 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Woods Of Watseka 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarker Inc 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cahaba Veneer, Inc. 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Futureguard Building Products 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titusville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Spice Company 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.