Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing · Virginia

Lignetics of Virginia

Kenbridge, VA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lignetics of Virginia runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Lignetics of Virginia: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lignetics of Virginia safety composite

Lignetics of Virginia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Lignetics of Virginia injury rate improved

Lignetics of Virginia's TCR fell 0.9 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=11.5 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Kenbridge, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Duraflame East, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duraflame East, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Lignetics of Virginia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lignetics of Virginia averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lignetics of Virginia TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=0 · 2018=11.5 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Lignetics of Virginia falls in its industry

405 Pressed logs of sawdust and ot establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Pressed logs of sawdust and ot employers in Virginia.

Lignetics of Virginia (20 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lignetics of Virginia
Lignetics of Virginia (20 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Lignetics of Virginia has fewer employees than the Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2018 11.5 11.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · VA · Kenbridge

405 Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 7 employers in Kenbridge, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duraflame East, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richwood Hardwood 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ConceptWorks Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hughes Brothers, Inc. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richmond Hatchery 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richmond Growout 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Gordonsville 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gordonsville 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Marble Manufacturers, Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Treatment Center 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pennington Seed Distribution - Kenbridge 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenbridge Construction Co., Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Gator Orlando 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Judson University 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hampshire Co. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Careone at Weymouth 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moberly Hotel 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5278 - P78cos-Fpco-Cos Co 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Valley Stow 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weelborg Chevrolet of Glencoe, LLC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.