Research and development in the physical- engineering and life sciences (except biotechnology) · Indiana

Lilly Corp Center

Indianapolis, IN · ~5,954 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lilly Corp Center runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Research and development in the physical- engineering and life sciences (except biotechnology) workplace, earning a grade F.

Lilly Corp Center: 1.2 TCR = 234% of Research and development in the physical- engineering and life sciences (except biotechnology) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lilly Corp Center safety composite

Lilly Corp Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lilly Corp Center held a steady TCR band

Lilly Corp Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.2 in 2023 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.2 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 1.2 · 234% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Foveon Inc 541712
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~5,954 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foveon Inc 541712 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Lilly Corp Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lilly Corp Center averages 1.2 TCR (234% of the Research and development in the physical- engineering and life sciences (except biotechnology) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lilly Corp Center TCR series: 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 0.5

Where Lilly Corp Center falls in its industry

319 Research and development in th establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Research and development in th employers in Indiana.

Lilly Corp Center (5,954 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lilly Corp Center
Lilly Corp Center (5,954 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Lilly Corp Center has more employees than the Research and development in the physical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.2 39 31 0
2023 1.2 0.2 31 38 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · IN · Indianapolis

319 Research and development in the physical- engineering and life sciences (except biotechnology) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foveon Inc 541712 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IfA-Manoa 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Ceramics and Plastics 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eli Lilly Lilly Corp Center 6,018 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
STATE-SIZE Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 6,222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health Care Associates, Inc 5,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 0f63 - Orlando Fire 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cactus Drilling Rig 166 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 22626 Sally Ride Dr 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Carrollton Utility Products Plant 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC 5,962 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tufts Medical Center 5,938 FTE
NAT-SIZE Further Processing 5,981 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.