Nursing homes · New Jersey

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center

Lafayette, NJ · ~129 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center: 19.0 TCR = 293% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.4

2021→2023

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 17.4 from 24.1 in 2021 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=24.1 · 2022=26.3 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lafayette, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.0 · 293% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #336/370
  • PHOTO Scott Health & Rehab…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott Health & Rehabilitaion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center averages 19.0 TCR (293% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2021=24.1 · 2022=26.3 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #336 safest of 370 Nursing homes employers in New Jersey.

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center (129 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center
Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center (129 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Limecrest Subacute and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 6.7 9 1 0
2022 26.3 23.9 6 16 0
2021 24.1 24.1 7 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NJ · Lafayette

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 6 employers in Lafayette, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott Health & Rehabilitaion 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accura Healthcare of Milford 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy at Salina 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie View Senior Living 19.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 201-NJ-New Jersey Central 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Automated Logic Controls (New York-New Jersey) 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Fire Protection, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Container 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carson Corporation 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11501 Lafayette 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR S05192 - WM Lafayette 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0000000118 QUICK CHEK FOOD STORE 36 FTE
NAT-TCR GateWay at River City 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gladwin Nursing & Rehabilitation Community 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie View Senior Living 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01968 19.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE P&S Transportation Garden City, GA 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Third Dimension 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kadant Johnson LLC Three Rivers 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duluth-Airgas Safety 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.