Other Support Activities for Road Transportation · Michigan

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M)

Detroit, MI · ~305 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Other Support Activities for Road Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M): 3.5 TCR = 77% of Other Support Activities for Road Transportation BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) safety composite

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2018→2023

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) injury rate improved

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M)'s TCR fell 6.7 from 8.9 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488490 · Detroit, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #9/20
  • PHOTO LINC 4678 (STONEBRID…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~305 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LINC 4678 (STONEBRIDGE - F) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the Other Support Activities for Road Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) TCR series: 2018=8.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) falls in its industry

370 Other Support Activities for R establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 20 Other Support Activities for R employers in Michigan.

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) (305 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Linc 7100 (Detroit - M)
Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) (305 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Linc 7100 (Detroit - M) has more employees than the Other Support Activities for Road Transp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 14 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 20 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.9 7.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488490 · MI · Detroit

370 Other Support Activities for Road Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LINC 4678 (STONEBRIDGE - F) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LINC 2820 (Charlotte NC - F) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&G (Plant) - Lima, OH (Spotting) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Werner Enterprises/ATLGA Terminal 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saint-Gobain 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richland 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3 Combat Propulsion Systems 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakkota Brownstown 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR B.C.T. Gin Co.,Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozarks Electric Cooperative-Fayetteville 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Back to Nature Landcare 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Eisenhart Crane Service, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #75 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #20 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marianjoy Medical Group 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Area Traffic Solutions 305 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.