Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices · Michigan

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M)

Warren, MI · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M): 2.1 TCR = 304% of Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) safety composite

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2023

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) injury rate improved

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M)'s TCR fell 1.8 from 4.0 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Warren, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.1 · 304% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #51/59
  • PHOTO 2000-DRC-EXCHANGE ST
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2000-DRC-EXCHANGE ST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) averages 2.1 TCR (304% of the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 0.7

Where Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 59 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg employers in Michigan.

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) (42 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Linc Go (Corporate Office - M)
Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) (42 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Linc Go (Corporate Office - M) has fewer employees than the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Mana median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · MI · Warren

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 290 employers in Warren, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2000-DRC-EXCHANGE ST 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Health System Office (470-8882) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Health System Office (470-OK-001) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pecora Center-other 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Meter 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Jackson 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennings & Sons 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Muskegon 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Technical Center 22,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Global Technical Center 21,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Truck Assembly Plant 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE
NAT-TCR Fabrication 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR M. Greenberg Construction, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sirois Tool Co., Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #57 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE UDS 8528 (Tempe - F) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groendyke Transport - Atlanta 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bridge at Farmington Assisted Living 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antique Brick and Block 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.