Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) · Massachusetts

Lincoln

Lincoln, MA · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lincoln runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) workplace, earning a grade F.

Lincoln: 9.2 TCR = 204% of Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lincoln safety composite

Lincoln scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2016→2024

Lincoln injury rate improved

Lincoln's TCR fell 11.1 from 14.1 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.1 · 2017=14.3 · 2018=10.0 · 2019=13.0 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Lincoln, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/58
  • PHOTO 5600 - K C Lenexa
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5600 - K C Lenexa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Lincoln in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lincoln averages 9.2 TCR (204% of the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lincoln TCR series: 2016=14.1 · 2017=14.3 · 2018=10 · 2019=13 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Lincoln falls in its industry

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 58 Tree services (e.g., bracing, employers in Massachusetts.

Lincoln (37 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lincoln
Lincoln (37 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Lincoln has fewer employees than the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2021 8.4 8.4 3 0 0
2020 11.3 11.3 4 0 0
2019 13.0 9.8 4 0 0
2018 10.0 6.7 3 0 0
2017 14.3 10.8 4 0 0
2016 14.1 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MA · Lincoln

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 5 employers in Lincoln, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5600 - K C Lenexa 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Springs 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hively Landscapes 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 134231 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Danvers, Electric Division 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE MIDDLESEX GASES & TECHNOLOGIES, INC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Builders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core Concepts Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSL/BN Commons CCRC LLC 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Carroll School 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSL/BN Commons AL/ALZ/SNF LLC 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum 59 FTE
NAT-TCR Webster Nursing Facility 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Steel-Fab & Machine Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ro-Mac Lumber & Supply - Leesburg 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bldg. A 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moran Center 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Fabricators, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE DOL009 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Danbury 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.