General warehousing and storage · New York

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse

Syracuse, NY · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse: 11.4 TCR = 196% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse safety composite

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.8

2017→2018

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse injury rate improved

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse's TCR fell 22.8 from 22.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=22.8 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.4 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #204/225
  • PHOTO ShopRite of Hunterdo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ShopRite of Hunterdon County Micro Fulfillment Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse averages 11.4 TCR (196% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse TCR series: 2017=22.8 · 2018=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 225 General warehousing and storag employers in New York.

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse (20 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse
Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse (20 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Lincoln Moving and Storage of Syracuse has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 22.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NY · Syracuse

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ShopRite of Hunterdon County Micro Fulfillment Center 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR URM Corporate 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDT2 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howard Logistics 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JOHNSON POTATO FARMS LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beds & Borders, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Minns Farms LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE H. F. Corwin & Son, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR 373 ABC Supply Co., inc 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Precison Equipment Mfg 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet East Cooper Fans 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City - 810 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marion Iron Company 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lightpath Electric - Charlotte 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ksi Trading Corp - 88fl 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tfrirv-Tfr-Tfr - Irving 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.