Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Linda Valley Assisted Living

Loma Linda, CA · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linda Valley Assisted Living runs at 428% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Linda Valley Assisted Living: 16.3 TCR = 428% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linda Valley Assisted Living safety composite

Linda Valley Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−54.6

2020→2022

Linda Valley Assisted Living injury rate improved

Linda Valley Assisted Living's TCR fell 54.6 from 60.9 in 2020 to 6.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 60.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=60.9 · 2021=26.2 · 2022=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Loma Linda, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.3 · 428% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #529/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Owatonna MC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Owatonna MC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Linda Valley Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linda Valley Assisted Living averages 16.3 TCR (428% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linda Valley Assisted Living TCR series: 2020=60.9 · 2021=26.2 · 2022=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Linda Valley Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #529 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Linda Valley Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Linda Valley Assisted Living
Linda Valley Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Linda Valley Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2021 26.2 26.2 1 7 0
2020 60.9 60.9 4 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Loma Linda

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 18 employers in Loma Linda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Owatonna MC 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Clairemont 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suzanne Elise assisted living 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63114 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loma Linda University Medical Center 6,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loma Linda University 2,854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loma Linda University Childrens Hospital 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loma Linda University Health Care 1,392 FTE
NAT-TCR 4186-DC10 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TopForm, Inc. 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply - Taylor 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Glade Valley Center 16.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hidden Lakes 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital One McLean Catering 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pt Burgess Mc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Es-Pres Mer Mc 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.