Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing · New Jersey

Linde - Alpha (Electronics)

Alpha, NJ · ~108 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Linde - Alpha (Electronics): 0.2 TCR = 6% of Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) safety composite

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) held a steady TCR band

Linde - Alpha (Electronics)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325120 · Alpha, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Sabine Pass LNG-L.P.…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sabine Pass LNG-L.P., LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linde - Alpha (Electronics) averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Linde - Alpha (Electronics) falls in its industry

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr employers in New Jersey.

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) (108 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Linde - Alpha (Electronics)
Linde - Alpha (Electronics) (108 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Linde - Alpha (Electronics) has more employees than the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325120 · NJ · Alpha

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 3 employers in Alpha, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sabine Pass LNG-L.P., LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Hydrogen - Natick 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkema Inc. Calvert City Plant 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Customer Engineering, Maintenance/Const/EST 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edward Leske Company 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonland Industries, Inc. 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teterboro Facility 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marcal Paper Company 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linde - Alpha (EPP) 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Magnetics, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-TCR 0f99 - Fire National Accounts - Raleigh 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Buske Lines Inc. 778 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips 66 - Wood River Refinery 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucker Construction Co. 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bentley University 921 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodville 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE 001m - Montgomery Al Rntl 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE 032k - St Cloud Mn Rntl 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.