Office administration services · New Jersey

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office

Linden, NJ · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Office administration services workplace, earning a grade C.

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Office administration services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office safety composite

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office held a steady TCR band

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · Linden, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/11
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Office administration services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office falls in its industry

544 Office administration services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 11 Office administration services employers in New Jersey.

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office (42 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office
Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office (42 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Linden Warehouse & Distribution- Office has fewer employees than the Office administration services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · NJ · Linden

544 Office administration services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 108 employers in Linden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Headquarters 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGO 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Beach Street (5411) 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apicore US LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carbro Constructors Corp Main 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE S. Batata Construction, Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Apron Linden FC 879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips66 Bayway Refinery 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Staffing Solutions 766 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayway Refinery 693 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quality Beverage LLC Hardeeville SC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMG-Behavioral Health 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unique Carpets, Ltd. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE AXP Lounge DFW 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.