Central heating equipment and piping installation · Colorado

Lind's Plumbing & Heating

Fort Collins, CO · ~123 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lind's Plumbing & Heating runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Central heating equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Lind's Plumbing & Heating: 6.6 TCR = 236% of Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lind's Plumbing & Heating safety composite

Lind's Plumbing & Heating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lind's Plumbing & Heating: 2.1 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2023

Lind's Plumbing & Heating's TCR rose 2.5 from 2.1 in 2018 to 4.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Fort Collins, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 236% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #103/156
  • PHOTO Bombard Mechanical LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bombard Mechanical LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Lind's Plumbing & Heating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lind's Plumbing & Heating averages 6.6 TCR (236% of the Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lind's Plumbing & Heating TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=4.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Lind's Plumbing & Heating falls in its industry

5,793 Central heating equipment and establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 156 Central heating equipment and employers in Colorado.

Lind's Plumbing & Heating (123 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lind's Plumbing & Heating
Lind's Plumbing & Heating (123 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Lind's Plumbing & Heating has more employees than the Central heating equipment and piping ins median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.6 4.6 4 0 0
2022 10.9 2.5 13 0 0
2021 9.1 1.8 10 0 0
2020 6.4 4.8 8 0 0
2018 2.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CO · Fort Collins

5,793 Central heating equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 268 employers in Fort Collins, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bombard Mechanical LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manning-Seivert Mechanical Contractors Inc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yavapai Mechanical 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Mechanical Services of Colorado Springs, LLC 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bighorn Solar 1 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Barricade Co 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heating Plumbing Engineers, Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Braconier Plumbing & Heating 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poudre Valley Hospital 1,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Collins 1,285 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Belgium Brewing Company: Fort Collins 759 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodward Inc. - Lincoln Campus Facility 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Specialty Dental 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S & S Distributing Marshfield 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bombard Mechanical LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumner Regional Medical Center LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forks II 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Checkers Foods 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Nursing Home 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE CEMCO - Pittsburg Plant 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.