Commercial building construction general contractors · Oklahoma

Lingo Construction Services

Oklahoma City, OK · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lingo Construction Services runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Lingo Construction Services: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lingo Construction Services safety composite

Lingo Construction Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Lingo Construction Services injury rate improved

Lingo Construction Services's TCR fell 4.9 from 6.8 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Oklahoma City, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/35
  • PHOTO Brickley Constructio…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brickley Construction Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Lingo Construction Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lingo Construction Services averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lingo Construction Services TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Lingo Construction Services falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 35 Commercial building constructi employers in Oklahoma.

Lingo Construction Services (95 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lingo Construction Services
Lingo Construction Services (95 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Lingo Construction Services has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 6.8 2.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OK · Oklahoma City

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brickley Construction Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolgast Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AML,Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prier Construction, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verdigris Valley Electric Cooperative 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Environmental LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Armstrong Flooring - Stillwater 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westerman Inc. - Tulsa 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR DCS Contracting, INC. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transpak - DIV 021 IPC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow River High School 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Willie Washer Mfg. Co. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Americare at Maplebrook Skilled Nursing 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linden 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Tool Group - Sumter 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sharp Grossmont Hospital Pom 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.