Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) · Pennsylvania

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA · ~129 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) workplace, earning a grade A.

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh: 2.4 TCR = 37% of Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh safety composite

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−62.3

2022→2023

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh injury rate improved

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh's TCR fell 62.3 from 64.7 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 64.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=64.7 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #44/754
  • PHOTO Liberty Management o…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Management of Wellington Bay, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh averages 2.4 TCR (37% of the Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh TCR series: 2022=64.7 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities (Skill establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 754 Nursing Care Facilities (Skill employers in Pennsylvania.

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh (129 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh
Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh (129 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Little Sisters of the Poor - Pittsburgh has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2022 64.7 32.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pittsburgh

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Management of Wellington Bay, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63190 SUNRISE OF BELLEVUE 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cortland Healthcare 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELMWOOD TERRACE HEALTHCARE CTR 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsy Transportation 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert Ganter Contractors Inc 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lugaila Mechanical Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frey Lutz LLC 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR AC & R Specialists 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Annadel Builders Incorporated 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR T&B Electric Co., Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hometown Food Company 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Acument 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&C Clean Team Enterprises, LLC DBA Widmer's 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASI,LLC 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Thomaston 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.