Real estate property managers' offices, residential · Michigan

Liv Communities Corporate Office

Grand Haven, MI · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Liv Communities Corporate Office runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Liv Communities Corporate Office: 2.0 TCR = 145% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Liv Communities Corporate Office safety composite

Liv Communities Corporate Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Liv Communities Corporate Office: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.08× in 2024

Liv Communities Corporate Office's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Grand Haven, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 145% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #10/58
  • PHOTO Phipps Neighborhoods…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phipps Neighborhoods Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Liv Communities Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Liv Communities Corporate Office averages 2.0 TCR (145% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Liv Communities Corporate Office TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 1.4

Where Liv Communities Corporate Office falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 58 Real estate property managers' employers in Michigan.

Liv Communities Corporate Office (31 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Liv Communities Corporate Office
Liv Communities Corporate Office (31 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Liv Communities Corporate Office has fewer employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2023 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MI · Grand Haven

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 81 employers in Grand Haven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phipps Neighborhoods Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fordham Bedford Renewal Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Travel Resort Services 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR StoryPoint of Avon Lake 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Greenhouse, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Production 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.B. Satkowiak's City Sewer Cleaners 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melching Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shape Corp - 14600 172nd Ave. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Ottawa Community Hospital 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Grand Haven Hospital-MH-MI 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Cresco Labs - Butler 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX ST Jones 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR B D Oil Gathering Corp 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Savage Farms Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ES Irvine CA 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Saint Paul Office of Financial Services Fleet Services 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ag Service, Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooper & Moore, Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.