Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Washington

LKD Aerospace, Inc

Snoqualmie, WA · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LKD Aerospace, Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

LKD Aerospace, Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LKD Aerospace, Inc safety composite

LKD Aerospace, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

LKD Aerospace, Inc held a steady TCR band

LKD Aerospace, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Snoqualmie, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/47
  • PHOTO Goodrich Corporation…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

LKD Aerospace, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LKD Aerospace, Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LKD Aerospace, Inc TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where LKD Aerospace, Inc falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 47 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Washington.

LKD Aerospace, Inc (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate LKD Aerospace, Inc
LKD Aerospace, Inc (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

LKD Aerospace, Inc has fewer employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Snoqualmie

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 20 employers in Snoqualmie, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-R955 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace Inc (WinstonSalem NC Fairchild 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC (Sterling VA) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Creek Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG ORCHARDS LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Hills 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Fruit, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snoqualmie Casino 1,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spacelabs Healthcare 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Public Hospital District #4 King County (DBA Snoqualmie Valley Hospital) 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technical Glass Products 185 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Aberdeen 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBO Seekonk 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanson Hospice Center 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeland Health Park Rehab 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.