Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Wisconsin

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East

Pleasant Prairie, WI · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East safety composite

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East: 3.6 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2020

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East's TCR rose 3.2 from 3.6 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Pleasant Prairie, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #42/53
  • PHOTO RICHMOND, VA
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RICHMOND, VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L&M Corrugated Container Corp East averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where L&M Corrugated Container Corp East falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 53 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Wisconsin.

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East (58 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate L&M Corrugated Container Corp East
L&M Corrugated Container Corp East (58 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

L&M Corrugated Container Corp East has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.8 1.7 4 0 0
2019 5.9 0.0 4 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.6 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · WI · Pleasant Prairie

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 97 employers in Pleasant Prairie, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RICHMOND, VA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA010 Albany Container 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corrugated Concepts & Packaging Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AtCorr 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hall's Calf Ranch 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Green Bay 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Warrens LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE AHC AMC Sheboygan Cty 17080007 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office - H1 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9555 - 76th Street 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate (H2) 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate (H1) 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Heartland Villa Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Long Green Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DMG Masonry LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Division 14 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spt Microtechnologies 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Talon - Tampa 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pocahontas Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASI Austin 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.