Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats · Texas

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD

San Antonio, TX · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD runs at 574% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats workplace, earning a grade F.

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD: 19.5 TCR = 574% of Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD safety composite

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−69.9

2017→2020

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD injury rate improved

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD's TCR fell 69.9 from 95.9 in 2017 to 26.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 95.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=95.9 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=20.8 · 2020=26.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.5 · 574% of ind

  • DART 21.7 DART
  • RANK #1887/1899
  • PHOTO Chico Natural Foods …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chico Natural Foods Cooperative Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD averages 19.5 TCR (574% of the Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD TCR series: 2017=95.9 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=20.8 · 2020=26 · BLS 3.4

Where LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD falls in its industry

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retail establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1887 safest of 1899 Delicatessens primarily retail employers in Texas.

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD (32 employees, TCR 19.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD
LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD (32 employees, TCR 19.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

LMMM San Antonio#3, LTD has fewer employees than the Delicatessens primarily retailing a rang median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 26.0 21.7 6 0 0
2019 20.8 20.8 5 0 0
2018 11.7 11.7 3 0 0
2017 95.9 95.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · TX · San Antonio

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chico Natural Foods Cooperative Inc 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-03611 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0105 Escondido 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0754 Baton Rouge 19.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch at Arroyo Seco, LTD 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Coyote Ranch 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Tulia 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR California Ofc/Whse 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Pacific Palisades Hotel, L.P. 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Porco Energy 19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chico Natural Foods Cooperative Inc 19.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida Public Utilities - NW Marianna 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Research Swine, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terry Henricks Ford 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.